| 응급의료기금 지원 사업 평가를 위한 델파이 연구 |
이선영1, 손유동2
, 신상도1, 송경준2, 홍기정1, 노영선1, 김태한1, 박정호1, 박관진3, 고서영4, 이승철5, 정유진6, 문성배7 |
1서울대학교병원 응급의학과(소방청)
2서울특별시 보라매병원 응급의학과
3충북대학교병원 응급의학과
4제주대학교병원 응급의학과
5동국대학교 일산병원 응급의학과
6전남대학교병원 응급의학과
7경북대학교병원 응급의학과 |
| Delphi study to evaluate the emergency medical system operation fund support projects |
| Sun Young Lee1, Youdong Sohn2
, Sang Do Shin1, Kyoung Jun Song2, Ki Jeong Hong1, Young Sun Ro1, Tae Han Kim1, Jeong Ho Park1, Gwan Jin Park3, Seo Young Ko4, Seung Chul Lee5, Eujene Jung6, Sungbae Moon7 |
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital (National Fire Agency), Seoul, Korea
2Department of Emergency Medicine, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
3Department of Emergency Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea
4Department of Emergency Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Korea
5Department of Emergency Medicine, Dongguk University Medical Center, Goyang, Korea
6Department of Emergency Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
7Department of Emergency Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea |
| Correspondence |
Youdong Sohn ,Tel: 02-870-2666, Fax: 02-741-7855, Email: medysohn@gmail.com,
|
|
|
Received: November 3, 2018; Revised: November 15, 2018 Accepted: December 2, 2018. Published online: August 30, 2019. |
|
|
|
| ABSTRACT |
Objective:
This study aimed to achieve expert consensus for the evaluation of Emergency medical system operation fund (EMSOF) support projects using the Delphi method in Korea.
Method:
The Delphi study was performed in June 2018. Experts who are members of the policy committee of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine (KSEM) participated in the study. Respondents were asked to express their level of agreement of appropriateness for the following 6 categories for 21 projects: project contents, amount of support, indicators, performance, overall evaluation, and need to maintain. With a possible score of 9 points, the project categories were classified into 3 groups, inappropriate, moderate and appropriate, based on the median score of the respondents’ ratings in each question.
Results:
Sixteen of the 18 policy committee members participated in the survey. Their average professional work years were 8.2 years. All 21 projects were evaluated as appropriate for content. Amount of support and indicators were evaluated as moderate. Only 5 out of the 21 projects were evaluated as having appropriate indicators. No projects were evaluated as ineffective. Comprehensive evaluation of the projects was evaluated as moderate, and no project was evaluated as inappropriate in fund support.
Conclusion:
Overall, the contents of the EMSOF assistance project were rated high; however, there was a disagreement on the amount of support and evaluation indicators for each project. The results of this study are expected to be used as basic data to improve the use of EMSOF. |
| Key words:
Emergency medical services (EMS); Delphi technique; Resource allocation |
|
PDF Links
Full text via DOI 
Download Citation 
CrossRef TDM
