| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
J Korean Soc Emerg Med > Volume 32(4); 2021 > Article
Journal of The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2021;32(4): 362-370.
119 대원에 의하여 지면 위 자세에서 이루어지는 기관내 삽관에서 비디오 후두경과 부지의 사용이 가지는 효과: 무작위 시뮬레이션 연구
송형우1 , 강구현1 , 장용수1 , 김원희1 , 최현영1 , 김재국1 , 이윤재1 , 김태용1 , 방성환2
1한림대학교 강남성심병원 응급의학과
2대전보건대학교 특전의무부사관과
Effect of the use of a video laryngoscope and bougie on the performance of endotracheal intubation on the ground by novice prehospital caregivers: a randomized simulation study
Hyung Woo Song1 , Gu Hyun Kang1 , Yong Soo Jang1 , Wonhee Kim1 , Hyun Young Choi1 , Jae Guk Kim1 , Yoonje Lee1 , Tae Yong Kim1 , Sung Hwan Bang2
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea
2Department of Non-commissioned Special Officer Academies, Daejeon Health Institute of Technology, Daejeon, Korea
Correspondence  Gu Hyun Kang ,Tel: 02-829-5119, Fax: 02-842-4217, Email: drkang9@gmail.com,
Received: June 29, 2020; Revised: August 31, 2020   Accepted: September 25, 2020.  Published online: August 31, 2021.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a bougie and glidescope video laryngoscope (GVL) for ground intubation by novice prehospital caregivers. We hypothesized that the intubation outcome using a bougie or GVL was superior to that using the Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL) with a stylet (MCLS) in ground intubation.
A randomized crossover manikin study was conducted. Studied groups were categorized into 4 according to the intubation devices used; MCLS, Macintosh laryngoscope with bougie (MCLB), glidescope video laryngoscope with a stylet (GVLS), and glidescope video laryngoscope with bougie (GVLB). The primary outcome was the total endotracheal intubation time and the secondary outcome was the success rate for endotracheal intubation.
The use of a bougie did not cause a significant difference in the intubation time (MCLS vs. MCLB, P=0.213; GVLS vs. GVLB, P=0.633) and the success rate of endotracheal intubation (MCLS vs. MCLB, P>0.990; GVLS vs. GVLB, P=0.077) was compared with the use of a stylet in MCL and GVL. The use of GVL showed a longer endotracheal intubation time compared with MCLS (MCLS vs. GVLS, P<0.001; MCLS vs. GVLB, P<0.001). GVLB showed a decreased success rate of endotracheal intubation compared with the use of MCL (MCLS vs. GVLB, P=0.004; MCLB vs. GVLB, P<0.001).
The use of the GVL and a bougie could not affect the performance of endotracheal intubation on the ground. The use of MCL and a stylet for ground intubation could increase the intubation success rate and shorten intubation time compared with the use of a bougie or the use of GVL.
Key words: Intubation; Airway management; Simulation training
PDF Links  PDF Links
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
CrossRef TDM  CrossRef TDM
Related article
Editorial Office
The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
101-3104, Brownstone Seoul, 464 Cheongpa-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04510, Korea
TEL: +82-63-250-2724   FAX: +82-63-250-1075   E-mail: playjhs@naver.com
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine.                 Developed in M2PI