| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
top_img
J Korean Soc Emerg Med > Volume 36(4); 2025 > Article
Journal of The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2025;36(4): 147-151.
크레아티닌 농도의 현장검사와 실험실검사 간의 일치도 평가
신예원1 , 진영호1,2 , 윤재철1,2 , 김소은1,2 , 정태오1,2
1전북대학교병원 응급의학과
2전북대학교 의과대학 응급의학교실
Agreement between creatinine performed in the emergency department point-of-care test and central laboratory test
Ye Won Shin1 , Young Ho Jin1,2 , Jae Chol Yoon1,2 , So Eun Kim1,2 , Tae Oh Jeong1,2
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
2Department of Emergency Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
Correspondence  Tae Oh Jeong ,Tel: 063-250-1075, Fax: 063-250-1075, Email: emmd@jbnu.ac.kr,
Received: October 31, 2023; Revised: November 7, 2023   Accepted: November 7, 2023.  Published online: August 28, 2025.
ABSTRACT
Objective:
This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between the creatinine levels measured by a point-of-care test (POCT) in the emergency department (ED) and that measured by a central laboratory test (CLT).
Methods:
We evaluated the agreement between the results of the creatinine levels obtained with the ABL90 Flex Plus analyzer in the ED and those measured by CLT. Both analyses were performed using the same samples between January 1 and 11, 2023. The agreement between the results was assessed by Passing-Bablok regression analysis and Bland-Altman plot. We also evaluated the frequency of the POCT samples meeting the maximum allowed difference suggested by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments.
Results:
A total of 813 consecutive paired sample analyses were conducted. Using the Bland-Altman method, the mean difference in the creatinine levels measured by the POCT and CLT was 0.06 mg/dL, and the range was -0.49 to 0.61 mg/dL. In these samples, the frequency of measurements not meeting the maximum allowed difference was 2.7%. In the analysis using the 363 paired samples in patients where contrast enhanced computed tomography was performed after checking creatinine levels with POCT, the mean difference in creatinine between POCT and CLT was 0.04 mg/dL, and the range was -0.01 to 0.18 mg/dL. In these, the frequency of samples not meeting the maximum allowed difference was 1.7%.
Conclusion:
The creatinine levels measured by the POCT showed good agreement with CLT measurements. The rapid measurement of creatinine through POCT could help the early detection of renal injury and screen high-risk patients for contrast-induced nephropathy in the ED.
Key words: Point-of-care testing; Creatinine; Computed tomography
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Share:      
METRICS
730
View
58
Download
Editorial Office
The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
TEL: +82-2-3676-1333   FAX: +82-2-3676-1339   E-mail: office@emergency.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine.                 Developed in M2PI